On 10/01/2018 04:07 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
> Commit 3836a38c added a $secret-undefine call at the end of
> 100-disk-encryption.t because the presence of the secret was
> reportedly causing an error when the test was run a 2nd
> time. Unfortunately the definition of "my $secret" was inside a SKIP:
> { ... } block, but the $secret->undefine was added just outside that
> block, so the test failed when it was run.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <la...@laine.org>
> ---
>
> NB: this test is disabled unconditionally at the start of the SKIP
> block anyway, so I'm not sure how Jim encountered the error leading to
> the original patch.
>
> scripts/qemu/100-disk-encryption.t | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/qemu/100-disk-encryption.t
> b/scripts/qemu/100-disk-encryption.t
> index 1a36650..12386ae 100644
> --- a/scripts/qemu/100-disk-encryption.t
> +++ b/scripts/qemu/100-disk-encryption.t
> @@ -117,6 +117,6 @@ diag "Undefining the inactive domain config";
> $dom->undefine;
>
> ok_error(sub { $conn->get_domain_by_name("tck") }, "NO_DOMAIN error raised
> from missing domain", 42);
> -}
>
> $secret->undefine;
> +}
Reviewed-by: Yash Mankad <yman...@redhat.com>
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
