On Tue, 2019-02-12 at 17:40 +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
> This time even in places that would possibly better be served by
> a more complex macro.
> 
> Can be squashed into the previous patch if requested.

I agree that the level of repetition might call for a local macro,
but you can do that in a follow-up patch; for the time being, just
squashing it into the previous one will do.

Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abolo...@redhat.com>

-- 
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to