s/snapashot/snapshot/

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 09:05:31AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
Even though Coverity can prove that 'last' is always set if the prior
loop executed, gcc 8.0.1 cannot:

 CC       conf/libvirt_conf_la-virdomainmomentobjlist.lo
../../src/conf/virdomainmomentobjlist.c: In function 
'virDomainMomentMoveChildren':
../../src/conf/virdomainmomentobjlist.c:178:19: error: 'last' may be used 
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
        last->sibling = to->first_child;
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Rewrite the loop to a form that should be easier for static analysis
to work with.


The build works for me so I cannot judge that part

Fixes: ced0898f86bf
Reported-by: Bjoern Walk <bw...@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
---

Qualifies as a build-breaker fix, but I'd like a review before pushing.

src/conf/virdomainmomentobjlist.c | 15 +++++++--------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/conf/virdomainmomentobjlist.c 
b/src/conf/virdomainmomentobjlist.c
index b9ca5b1318..5a217056d1 100644
--- a/src/conf/virdomainmomentobjlist.c
+++ b/src/conf/virdomainmomentobjlist.c
@@ -164,18 +164,17 @@ void
virDomainMomentMoveChildren(virDomainMomentObjPtr from,
                            virDomainMomentObjPtr to)
{
-    virDomainMomentObjPtr child;
-    virDomainMomentObjPtr last;
+    virDomainMomentObjPtr child = from->first_child;

-    if (!from->first_child)
-        return;

From the code-change point-of view, by removing this condition,

-    for (child = from->first_child; child; child = child->sibling) {
+    while (child) {
        child->parent = to;
-        if (!child->sibling)
-            last = child;
+        if (!child->sibling) {
+            child->sibling = to->first_child;
+            break;
+        }
+        child = child->sibling;
    }
    to->nchildren += from->nchildren;
-    last->sibling = to->first_child;
    to->first_child = from->first_child;

this possibly erases 'to->first_child' if 'from' does not have any.
But the callers are reasonable and only call this if (from->nchildren)

    from->nchildren = 0;
    from->first_child = NULL;

Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jto...@redhat.com>

Jano

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to