On 4/29/19 12:32 PM, Fabiano FidĂȘncio wrote:
firmware attribute from <os/> takes either 'efi' or 'bios' as its
allowed values. However, the current documentation mistakenly mentions
'uefi' instead of 'efi'.

Signed-off-by: Fabiano FidĂȘncio <fiden...@redhat.com>
---
  docs/formatdomain.html.in | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
index d27ab07cbb..e1da878fcc 100644
--- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
+++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@
<pre>
  ...
-&lt;os firmware='uefi'&gt;
+&lt;os firmware='efi'&gt;
    &lt;type&gt;hvm&lt;/type&gt;
    &lt;loader readonly='yes' secure='no' 
type='rom'&gt;/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader&lt;/loader&gt;
    &lt;nvram 
template='/usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_VARS.fd'&gt;/var/lib/libvirt/nvram/guest_VARS.fd&lt;/nvram&gt;



ACKed and pushed.

Thanks,
Michal

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to