On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 04:35:37PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
The fact that we're removing a pool object from the list of pools
doesn't mean we want to unlock it. It violates locking policy
too as object locking and unlocking is not done on the same
level.

Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com>
---
src/conf/virstorageobj.c     |  5 ++---
src/storage/storage_driver.c | 17 +++--------------
src/test/test_driver.c       | 14 +++-----------
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)


Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jto...@redhat.com>

Jano

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to