On 8/19/19 7:22 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 8/16/19 5:10 PM, Laine Stump wrote: > > > > To extend this question - there's also xen's pciback, but I don't know enough > about Xen to tell if it's still in use.
Yes, it is still in use. > Might be worth dropping that too, > becasue it looks a lot like pci-stub (used for KVM assignment). And because > of > that I can't really drop all the functions, only very few. Jim? Nooooooo! Please don't drop (or break) functionality related to xen-pciback :-). > BTW: does Xen's kernel have 'driver_override' file for PCI devices? See > virPCIDeviceBindWithDriverOverride() for more info. Yes, xen supports driver_override. > But if it does, I'd like to > also drop the old 'newid' style of overriding kernel driver and leave us with > solely with 'driver_override' (introduced in kernel-3.16.0 so I guess > everybody > has it). Would be nice to kill the 'newid' handling. I thought it sounded familiar, and not in a good way: 70f83f9d526 (Jim Fehlig 2016-08-01 21:36:45 -0600 1265) * to the unpleasant new_id interface. Regards, Jim -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
