On 9/5/19 1:57 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
How about we add a paragraph at the end of the section that says
something along the lines of
Both the lists above are subject to change: code written in a new
programming language might be accepted if it's generally agreed
that the advantages of using that specific language instead of one
of the preferred ones outweight the resulting increase in cognitive
load, and that might in turn result in one of more of the preferred
languages losing their status; in the same way, languages that have
been purged from the project in the past might once again become
acceptable, although such a reversal would require an even more
impressive cost/benefit ratio.
?
That *definitely* needs more cowbell!
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
