On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:31:34PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 11:02 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:59:01AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > > For what it's worth, I also prefer 'syntax': the -check suffix is > > > useful for make because it highlights that you're verifying some > > > property of the program, and also clearly ties > > > > > > make check > > > make syntax-check > > > > > > together. In the case of Meson, the fact that you're verifying > > > something is explicit in the name of the ninja target, and also > > > > > > ninja test --suite unit > > > ninja test --suite syntax > > > > > > are already very obviously connected. Using 'syntax-check' for the > > > latter would, if anything, make the relationship unbalanced: why > > > didn't we call the former 'unit-check' then? > > > > How about calling the suite "style" rather than "syntax" since I > > think that better reflects what it is actually doing. It is coding > > style / guidelines checks. > > Sounds good to me!
Works for me as well. Pavel
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
