On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:59:00 +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:55:40 +0100, Ján Tomko wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 05:05:22PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > Historically iothreads were the first feature and thus didn't have it's > > > own section. Add them to <features> for consistency with other features. > > > > > > > I'm not convinced duplicating this is a good idea - apps looking into > > the <features> element for iothread support would only find it with > > libvirt new enough to have it there and miss out on iothread support > > with older libvirt. > > I certainly can keep 'iothreads' separate. I'm definitely not going to > add an special case into the formatter to avoid formatting it there. > > Also to be fair I'm not sure whether it's worth caring about the > outlined scenario. If an APP looks for iothreads in <features> it should > not be used with older libvirt than the one where it was added. > > At any rate, I can drop this patch and keep the iothreads stuff > separate.
Also any new app will have to write two lookup XPaths to get all the data as it's now rather than having everything in one place. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
