On 12/18/19 5:34 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:19 AM Marc Hartmayer <mhart...@linux.ibm.com> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 05:41 PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio >> <fiden...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fiden...@redhat.com> >>> --- >>> src/util/virutil.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/src/util/virutil.c b/src/util/virutil.c >>> index ed1f696e37..8c255abd7f 100644 >>> --- a/src/util/virutil.c >>> +++ b/src/util/virutil.c >>> @@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ virGetHostnameQuiet(void) >>> char * >>> virGetUserDirectory(void) >>> { >>> - return virGetUserDirectoryByUID(geteuid()); >>> + return g_strdup_printf("%s/libvirt", g_get_home_dir()); >> >> >> I would suggest to use 'g_build_path' instead of 'g_strdup_printf'. >> E.g. >> >> g_build_path(G_DIR_SEPARATOR_S, g_get_home_dir(), "libvirt"); >
Good catch There's also g_build_filename which sounds simpler. Any reason for one over the other? - Cole -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list