On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 03:49:46PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 18:20 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Now that we have more than just the libvirtd daemon, we should be
> > explaining to users what they are all for & important aspects of their
> > configuration.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  docs/daemons.rst  | 682 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  docs/docs.html.in |   3 +
> >  2 files changed, 685 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 docs/daemons.rst
> 
> I've spotted a few minor issues and I've fixed them, along with the
> ones that Erik had already pointed out, in the attached patch. Please
> squash it in before pushing.

There's no patch attached.

> 
> Everything else looks good, so
> 
>   Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abolo...@redhat.com>
> 
> I've enabled split-daemon mode on my laptop and it seems to work
> quite seamlessly; however, I had to put SELinux into Permissive mode
> because I was getting
> 
>   audit[470365]: AVC avc:  denied  { search } for
>     pid=470365 comm="virtlogd" name="470092" dev="proc" ino=1314622
>     scontext=system_u:system_r:virtlogd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
>     tcontext=system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0
>     tclass=dir permissive=0

There is an RFE open with SELinux maintainers to apply labelling to
the new daemons.

They all currently run  unconfined_service_t.

We requested to make them use  virtd_t to have parity with libvirtd
policy.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

Reply via email to