On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:31:36 +0200 Andrea Bolognani <abolo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> The idea behind this document is to show, with actual examples, > that users should not expect PCI addresses in the domain XML and > in the guest OS to match. > > The first zPCI example already serves this purpose perfectly, so > in the interest of keeping the page as brief and easy to digest > as possible the second one is removed. > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abolo...@redhat.com> > --- > docs/pci-addresses.rst | 19 ------------------- > 1 file changed, 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/docs/pci-addresses.rst b/docs/pci-addresses.rst > index 86a41df6ce..1d2dc8e5fc 100644 > --- a/docs/pci-addresses.rst > +++ b/docs/pci-addresses.rst > @@ -204,25 +204,6 @@ will result in the exactly same view in the guest, as > the addresses there > are generated from the information provided via the ``zpci`` element (in > fact, from the ``uid``). > > -Therefore, replacing the virtio-net device definition with the following XML > -snippet > - > -:: > - > - <interface type='bridge'> > - <source bridge='virbr0'/> > - <model type='virtio'/> > - <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x01' slot='0x07' > function='0x3'> > - <zpci uid='0x0007' fid='0x00000003'/> > - </address> > - </interface> > - > -will yield the following result in a Linux guest: > - > -:: > - > - 0007:00:00.0 Ethernet controller: Red Hat, Inc. Virtio network device > - > > Device assignment > ================= Hm, should that rather go somewhere else? What I wanted to show is "you can have the same PCI address in the XML and still get a different PCI address in the guest, if you change the zpci values", as that might be another source of confusion.
