On 2020-04-21 04:50, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 15:25:10 -0400, Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum wrote:
We make an additional call to qom-list-types. Adjust
qemucapabilitiesdata accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <to...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
.../caps_2.10.0.aarch64.replies | 2699 ++-
.../caps_2.10.0.ppc64.replies | 2799 +++-
.../caps_2.10.0.s390x.replies | 1027 +-
.../caps_2.10.0.x86_64.replies | 1708 +-
.../caps_2.11.0.s390x.replies | 1063 +-
.../caps_2.11.0.x86_64.replies | 1692 +-
.../caps_2.12.0.aarch64.replies | 2912 +++-
.../caps_2.12.0.ppc64.replies | 2947 +++-
.../caps_2.12.0.s390x.replies | 1087 +-
.../caps_2.12.0.x86_64.replies | 1767 +-
.../caps_3.0.0.ppc64.replies | 2979 +++-
.../caps_3.0.0.s390x.replies | 1117 +-
.../caps_3.0.0.x86_64.replies | 1783 +-
.../caps_3.1.0.ppc64.replies | 2999 +++-
.../caps_3.1.0.x86_64.replies | 1803 +-
.../caps_4.0.0.aarch64.replies | 3175 +++-
.../caps_4.0.0.ppc64.replies | 3171 +++-
.../caps_4.0.0.s390x.replies | 1259 +-
.../caps_4.0.0.x86_64.replies | 1915 ++-
.../caps_4.1.0.x86_64.replies | 2155 ++-
.../caps_4.2.0.aarch64.replies | 3355 +++-
.../caps_4.2.0.ppc64.replies | 3208 +++-
.../caps_4.2.0.s390x.replies | 1264 +-
.../caps_4.2.0.x86_64.replies | 2244 ++-
.../caps_5.0.0.aarch64.replies | 3391 +++-
.../caps_5.0.0.ppc64.replies | 13986
+++++++++-------
.../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_5.0.0.ppc64.xml | 1214 +-
.../caps_5.0.0.x86_64.replies | 2267 ++-
28 files changed, 64830 insertions(+), 8156 deletions(-)
Note that these changes must be part of the commit which actually addss
the calls
Got it. My bad.
diff --git a/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.10.0.aarch64.replies
b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.10.0.aarch64.replies
index c75d4ab8a7..a9587e24ed 100644
--- a/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.10.0.aarch64.replies
+++ b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.10.0.aarch64.replies
@@ -3078,12 +3078,2587 @@
"id": "libvirt-6"
}
+{
+ "execute": "qom-list-types",
+ "id": "libvirt-7"
+}
We already do call 'qom-list-types' once visible as command libvirt-6
above. You really should re-use the data rather than calling it again.
My thinking was that the check for TCG should mimic the checks for KVM.
Given that it is an accelerator rather than a device, it didn't seem
right to put it in the virQEMUCapsProbeQMPDevices function, although
I agree that it is inelegant to make an extra QMP query.
Since the capability is added only when accel-tcg is not present in
the output of qom-list-types, it can't be set via the array
like the other devices are. I could move virQEMUCapsProbeQMPTCGState to
be inside of virQEMUCapsProbeQMPDevices and use the same values. Perhaps
that would be best? I will prepare update soon.
