On a Wednesday in 2020, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
This tests aims to exercise how a TPM Proxy device can be
added in the domain, either alone or with a regular TPM
device. It also ensures that we do not allow bogus scenarios
to slip by.

Tested-by: Satheesh Rajendran <sathn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb...@gmail.com>
---
tests/qemuxml2argvdata/ppc64-tpm-double.xml   | 34 ++++++++++++++
.../ppc64-tpmproxy-double.xml                 | 38 +++++++++++++++
.../ppc64-tpmproxy-single.xml                 | 33 +++++++++++++
.../ppc64-tpmproxy-with-tpm.xml               | 36 +++++++++++++++
tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c                      | 12 +++++
.../ppc64-tpmproxy-single.ppc64-latest.xml    | 42 +++++++++++++++++
.../ppc64-tpmproxy-with-tpm.ppc64-latest.xml  | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
tests/qemuxml2xmltest.c                       |  2 +
8 files changed, 243 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/ppc64-tpm-double.xml
create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/ppc64-tpmproxy-double.xml
create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/ppc64-tpmproxy-single.xml
create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/ppc64-tpmproxy-with-tpm.xml
create mode 100644 
tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/ppc64-tpmproxy-single.ppc64-latest.xml
create mode 100644 
tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/ppc64-tpmproxy-with-tpm.ppc64-latest.xml


Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jto...@redhat.com>

Jano

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to