According to Jim Meyering on 2/19/2010 6:50 AM: >> Why the change in .gnulib? Shouldn't that be an independent patch? > > Well spotted. > I saw it too, and (as you probably noticed) removed it > from the updated patch.
I still see it in your most recent post: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-February/msg00698.html -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake e...@byu.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
