On 11/12/20 9:29 PM, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
diff --git a/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c
b/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c index 6bbff571..5f57000e 100644
--- a/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c
+++ b/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c
@@ -1241,6 +1241,25 @@ udevProcessAPQueue(struct udev_device *device,
}
+static int
+udevProcessAPMatrix(struct udev_device *device,
+ virNodeDeviceDefPtr def)
+{
+ size_t i;
+ virNodeDevCapDataPtr data = &def->caps->data;
+
+ data->ap_matrix.addr =
g_strdup(udev_device_get_sysname(device));
+ def->name = g_strdup_printf("ap_%s", data->ap_matrix.addr);
So you're setting this 'addr' field, but it is not used anywhere else in
this patch. Perhaps you'll use it in upcoming patches. But it is not
formatted into the node device xml or anything like that. Is that
intentional?
Yes, it is not formatted into the node device xml.
I will include this change in the patch 10.
+
+ for (i = 0; i < strlen(def->name); i++) {
+ if (!(g_ascii_isalnum(*(def->name + i))))
+ *(def->name + i) = '_';
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
Out of curiosity, what's the reason that you're
hard-coding an "ap_" prefix to the nodedev name rather than just using
udevGenerateDeviceName() like all of the other device types?
The name generated with udevGenerateDeviceName() is matrix_matrix (as
both udev_device_get_subsystem and udev_device_get_sysname returns
matrix), which is not very helpful, so we decided to go with ap_matrix
instead.
--
Kind regards
Shalini Chellathurai Saroja
Linux on Z and Virtualization Development
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Gregor Pillen
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
