On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 09:54:06AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 20:34:22 +0100, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > It's used only by storage file code so it doesn't make sense to have
> > it in util directory.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrd...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  po/POTFILES.in                                            | 2 +-
> >  src/libvirt_private.syms                                  | 8 ++++----
> >  src/storage_file/meson.build                              | 1 +
> >  .../storage_file_backend.c}                               | 4 ++--
> >  .../storage_file_backend.h}                               | 2 +-
> >  src/storage_file/storage_file_fs.c                        | 2 +-
> >  src/storage_file/storage_file_gluster.c                   | 2 +-
> >  src/storage_file/storage_source.c                         | 2 +-
> >  src/util/meson.build                                      | 1 -
> >  9 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >  rename src/{util/virstoragefilebackend.c => 
> > storage_file/storage_file_backend.c} (97%)
> >  rename src/{util/virstoragefilebackend.h => 
> > storage_file/storage_file_backend.h} (97%)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkre...@redhat.com>
> 
> although I'm probably more inclined to keep the original name without
> underscores and with vir prefix.

I personally don't have any preference. The only motivation was not to
mix two different naming styles withing one directory.

We should eventually unify the file naming style across the whole
project as we use underscores, dash and nothing all over the place.

Pavel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to