On 03/02/2010 06:46 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
According to David Allan on 3/2/2010 3:13 PM:
---
  tools/virsh.c |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/virsh.c b/tools/virsh.c
index a6a637d..e52b011 100644
--- a/tools/virsh.c
+++ b/tools/virsh.c
@@ -5221,6 +5221,47 @@ cmdVolDelete(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd)


  /*
+ * "vol-zero-out" command
+ */
+static const vshCmdInfo info_vol_zero_out[] = {
+    {"help", gettext_noop("zero out a vol")},
+    {"desc", gettext_noop("Ensure further reads from a volume return 
zeroes.")},

Unrelated to your patch, but is there any reason we don't use N_() as the
idiomatic counterpart to _(), rather than spelling out gettext_noop
everywhere?


I assume inertia, but someone else may have a better answer.

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to