On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 05:56:01PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 10:41:09AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > > According to David Allan on 3/5/2010 10:25 AM: > > > I added a section on good and bad uses of goto to the hacking document > > > and website. > > > > > > Also, should we dispense with the HACKING file's content altogether and > > > replace it with a link to hacking.html on the website? > > > > Is there a make rule to generate one from the other? > > I think the HTML version is more important. Either we can kill HACKING > or do a HTML->Text conversion for it
I think keeping a text version for that one is at least in spirit a good idea, just generate it from HTML. I suggest to commit the change to the hacking.html.in but not change the text file yet, I will try to come up with the tiny XSLT needed to generate it hopefully this week. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ dan...@veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
