On 6/4/21 2:50 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:36:11AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> This test was generated on a guest with the following NUMA >> configuration: >> >> <numa> >> <cell id='0' cpus='0-23' memory='4194304' unit='KiB' discard='yes'> >> <cache level='1' associativity='direct' policy='writeback'> >> <size value='10' unit='KiB'/> >> <line value='8' unit='B'/> >> </cache> >> <cache level='2' associativity='full' policy='writethrough'> >> <size value='128' unit='KiB'/> >> <line value='16' unit='B'/> >> </cache> >> </cell> >> <cell id='1' memory='2097152' unit='KiB'> >> <cache level='1' associativity='direct' policy='writeback'> >> <size value='10' unit='KiB'/> >> <line value='8' unit='B'/> >> </cache> >> </cell> >> <interconnects> >> <latency initiator='0' target='0' type='access' value='5'/> >> <latency initiator='0' target='0' type='read' value='6'/> >> <latency initiator='0' target='0' type='write' value='7'/> >> <latency initiator='0' target='1' type='access' value='10'/> >> <latency initiator='0' target='1' type='read' value='11'/> >> <latency initiator='0' target='1' type='write' value='12'/> >> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' type='access' >> value='204800' unit='KiB'/> >> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' type='read' value='205824' >> unit='KiB'/> >> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' type='write' value='206848' >> unit='KiB'/> >> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' cache='1' type='access' >> value='208896' unit='KiB'/> >> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' cache='1' type='read' >> value='209920' unit='KiB'/> >> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' cache='1' type='write' >> value='210944' unit='KiB'/> >> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' type='access' >> value='102400' unit='KiB'/> >> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' type='read' value='103424' >> unit='KiB'/> >> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' type='write' value='104448' >> unit='KiB'/> >> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' cache='1' type='access' >> value='105472' unit='KiB'/> >> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' cache='1' type='read' >> value='106496' unit='KiB'/> >> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' cache='1' type='write' >> value='107520' unit='KiB'/> >> </interconnects> >> </numa> >> >> The sysfs content was also copied over from the VM but only those >> files which are accessed in the test are stored in the repo. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com> >> --- > > This unfortunately introduces symbolic link loops. They are fine in > sysfs, but we always had issues with them when running distcheck and > similar. > > I tried it now and did not reproduce the exact issue, but it still is > not nice (global -u complains, some programs might just end up in an > infinite loop). Historically we replicated "just enough" to use it in > tests, but not so much that it would introduce loops. I would prefer if > it stayed that way.
Yeah, I remember us fixing this, but I don't recall all the details. I'll switch to files. Michal
