On a Monday in 2021, Laine Stump wrote:
On 9/4/21 4:44 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:

@@ -319,9 +308,9 @@ testFileIsSharedFSType(const void *opaque G_GNUC_UNUSED)
     return EXIT_AM_SKIP;
 #else
     const struct testFileIsSharedFSType *data = opaque;
+    int ret = -1;
     g_autofree char *mtabFile = NULL;
     bool actual;
-    int ret = -1;

unrelated (well, only peripherally related) code movement.

[...]


@@ -199,15 +195,15 @@ testVirPCIDeviceReattach(const void *opaque G_GNUC_UNUSED)
     for (i = 0; i < nDev; i++) {
         if (virPCIDeviceReattach(dev[i], activeDevs, inactiveDevs) < 0)
-            goto cleanup;
+            return -1;
         CHECK_LIST_COUNT(activeDevs, 0);
         CHECK_LIST_COUNT(inactiveDevs, nDev - i - 1);
     }
-    ret = 0;
+    return 0;
  cleanup:
-    return ret;
+    return -1;
 }


Oops. You forgot one! cleanup is no longer referenced, but you didn't remove it (or the dead code "return -1;" following it)


'cleanup' is still referenced inside the 'CHECK_LIST_COUNT' macro,
which is also used by testVirPCIDeviceReset and testVirPCIDeviceDetach.

On second thought, mixing returns with cleanups does not seem like
a good idea and I will drop this partial conversion before pushing.

Jano

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to