Am Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:25:20 -0600 schrieb Jim Fehlig <jfeh...@suse.com>:
> >> I think it is wrong to use internal libvirt values for internal > >> libxentoollog values. > What is gained over the sparse mapping? Are values not covered actually > useful > in practice? Also, how are the values specified when using the xl tool? A > quick > peek at the code seems to imply using more 'v' options. E.g. 'xl -vvvv ...'. Since libvirt has no control about what libxentoollog values the authors use, it should provide a simple way to request a specific loglevel. xl decided to use the number of v's for it. > If such a setting is actually needed, then the proper place would be > /etc/libvirt/libxl.conf. And IMO we should avoid creating a new name that > could > potentially confuse users. If 'xentoollog_level' is the common jargon in xen, > we > should stick with the same name. If that is an acceptable approach I will try to prepare a patch. Olaf
pgpUmPRy5caRf.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
