On 17/05/2022 13.19, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:
On 5/17/22 10:34, Thomas Huth wrote:
This remains, and that's fine. One step at time.
Not sure how we want to proceed with that in the long run, though
... IIRC clearly, Paolo once said that it doesn't really belong into
"-display" anyway and should be handled with the separate "-vnc"
option instead?
Not me, Gerd
(https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210825092023.81396-2-th...@redhat.com/T/#e8c4f826cc8ff48b9afad37703e11704137f540c8):
Other way around, -display vnc should be dropped. -display is about
local displays, and there can be only one instance. -vnc / -spice
enable remote access, and this can be done in addition to a local
display.
not possible:
-display gtk + -display sdl
possible:
-display gtk + -vnc
-display gtk + -vnc + -spice
-display none + -vnc + -spice
For what it's worth, Libvirt uses both -vnc and -spice, so we might
very well proceed with Gerd's idea. If we don't like -vnc and -spice
then it may be possible to QOMify them and go with -object.
Are we ready to deprecate -display vnc?
If nobody disagrees, I'd say yes.
Thomas
