What's the reasoning for making this change ?
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 02:59:58PM +0200, Kristina Hanicova wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kristina Hanicova <khani...@redhat.com>
> ---
> src/conf/domain_conf.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> index 44a01ab628..bc4b74c1c8 100644
> --- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> +++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> @@ -4084,8 +4084,8 @@ virDomainObjGetPersistentDef(virDomainXMLOption *xmlopt,
>
> if (domain->newDef)
> return domain->newDef;
> - else
> - return domain->def;
> +
> + return domain->def;
> }
> @@ -4223,8 +4223,8 @@ virDomainObjGetOneDefState(virDomainObj *vm,
>
> if (virDomainObjIsActive(vm) && flags & VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG)
> return vm->newDef;
> - else
> - return vm->def;
> +
> + return vm->def;
> }
I'm not really convinced these two changes are better.
>
>
> @@ -6029,7 +6029,9 @@ virDomainHostdevDefParseXMLSubsys(xmlNodePtr node,
> VIR_XML_PROP_NONZERO,
> &scsisrc->sgio)) < 0) {
> return -1;
> - } else if (rv > 0) {
> + }
> +
> + if (rv > 0) {
> if (def->source.subsys.type != VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_SUBSYS_TYPE_SCSI) {
> virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR, "%s",
> _("sgio is only supported for scsi host device"));
> @@ -6041,8 +6043,9 @@ virDomainHostdevDefParseXMLSubsys(xmlNodePtr node,
> VIR_XML_PROP_NONE,
> &scsisrc->rawio)) < 0) {
> return -1;
> - } else if (rv > 0 &&
> - def->source.subsys.type !=
> VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_SUBSYS_TYPE_SCSI) {
> + }
> +
> + if (rv > 0 && def->source.subsys.type !=
> VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_SUBSYS_TYPE_SCSI) {
> virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR, "%s",
> _("rawio is only supported for scsi host device"));
> return -1;
I don't mind eliminating the else, when the first 'if' is just an
error return/goto case.
> @@ -8056,15 +8059,15 @@ virDomainControllerModelTypeFromString(const
> virDomainControllerDef *def,
> {
> if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_SCSI)
> return virDomainControllerModelSCSITypeFromString(model);
> - else if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_USB)
> + if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_USB)
> return virDomainControllerModelUSBTypeFromString(model);
> - else if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_PCI)
> + if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_PCI)
> return virDomainControllerModelPCITypeFromString(model);
> - else if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_IDE)
> + if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_IDE)
> return virDomainControllerModelIDETypeFromString(model);
> - else if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_VIRTIO_SERIAL)
> + if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_VIRTIO_SERIAL)
> return virDomainControllerModelVirtioSerialTypeFromString(model);
> - else if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_ISA)
> + if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_ISA)
> return virDomainControllerModelISATypeFromString(model);
This giant if/else should be a switch instead
>
> return -1;
> @@ -8077,15 +8080,15 @@
> virDomainControllerModelTypeToString(virDomainControllerDef *def,
> {
> if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_SCSI)
> return virDomainControllerModelSCSITypeToString(model);
> - else if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_USB)
> + if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_USB)
> return virDomainControllerModelUSBTypeToString(model);
> - else if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_PCI)
> + if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_PCI)
> return virDomainControllerModelPCITypeToString(model);
> - else if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_IDE)
> + if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_IDE)
> return virDomainControllerModelIDETypeToString(model);
> - else if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_VIRTIO_SERIAL)
> + if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_VIRTIO_SERIAL)
> return virDomainControllerModelVirtioSerialTypeToString(model);
> - else if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_ISA)
> + if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_ISA)
> return virDomainControllerModelISATypeToString(model);
Likewise a switch.
>
> return NULL;
> @@ -9915,9 +9918,10 @@ virDomainChrSourceDefParseXML(virDomainChrSourceDef
> *def,
>
> ctxt->node = cur;
>
> - if ((nsources = virXPathNodeSet("./source", ctxt, &sources)) < 0) {
> + if ((nsources = virXPathNodeSet("./source", ctxt, &sources)) < 0)
> goto error;
> - } else if (nsources > 0) {
> +
> + if (nsources > 0) {
> /* Parse only the first source element since only one is used
> * for chardev devices, the only exception is UDP type, where
> * user can specify two source elements. */
> @@ -9926,7 +9930,8 @@ virDomainChrSourceDefParseXML(virDomainChrSourceDef
> *def,
> _("only one source element is allowed for "
> "character device"));
> goto error;
> - } else if (nsources > 2) {
> + }
> + if (nsources > 2) {
> virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR, "%s",
> _("only two source elements are allowed for "
> "character device"));
> @@ -10006,9 +10011,10 @@ virDomainChrSourceDefParseXML(virDomainChrSourceDef
> *def,
> }
> }
>
> - if ((nlogs = virXPathNodeSet("./log", ctxt, &logs)) < 0) {
> + if ((nlogs = virXPathNodeSet("./log", ctxt, &logs)) < 0)
> goto error;
> - } else if (nlogs == 1) {
> +
> + if (nlogs == 1) {
> if (virDomainChrSourceDefParseLog(def, logs[0]) < 0)
> goto error;
> } else if (nlogs > 1) {
> @@ -10018,9 +10024,10 @@ virDomainChrSourceDefParseXML(virDomainChrSourceDef
> *def,
> goto error;
> }
>
> - if ((nprotocols = virXPathNodeSet("./protocol", ctxt, &protocols)) < 0) {
> + if ((nprotocols = virXPathNodeSet("./protocol", ctxt, &protocols)) < 0)
> goto error;
> - } else if (nprotocols == 1) {
> +
> + if (nprotocols == 1) {
> if (virDomainChrSourceDefParseProtocol(def, protocols[0]) < 0)
> goto error;
> } else if (nprotocols > 1) {
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
