On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:21:14AM -1000, Richard Henderson wrote: > > Removing support for building on 32 bit systems seems like a pity - it's > > one of a small number of ways to run 64 bit binaries on 32 bit systems, > > and the maintainance overhead is quite small. > > It's not that small.
Meaning there are lots of ways to run 64 bit binaries on 32 bit systems? -- MST
