On 7/10/23 12:07, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:02:35PM +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote: >> On 7/5/23 8:20 AM, Boris Fiuczynski wrote: >>> Enable by default asynchronous teardown on S390 hosts and add tests for >>> asynchronous teardown autogeneration support. >>> On S390 hosts, Secure Execution guests can take a long time to shutdown, >>> since the memory cleanup can take a long time. Since there is no >>> practical way to determine whether a S390 guest is running in Secure >>> Execution mode, and since the asynchronous teardown does not impact >>> normal (not Secure Execution) guests or guests without large memory >>> configurations, we enable asynchronous teardown by default on S390. >>> A user can select to override the default in the guest domain XML. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski<fiu...@linux.ibm.com> >>> --- >> >> As it turns out the discussion seems to be on this patch only. >> Would it be acceptable to push the first four patches off the series without >> the fifth patch? > > Yes, that's fine. > > With regards, > Daniel
Merged now. Michal
