On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 11:11:09AM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote: > On 8/29/23 09:04, Shaleen Bathla wrote: > > ping > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Shaleen Bathla <shaleen.bat...@oracle.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 2:44 PM > > To: libvir-list@redhat.com > > Subject: [RFC] Adding timestamp to guest's serial console log > > > > Hi, > > > > Need some comments regarding the following feature : > > Addition of timestamp support for serial console logs of a guest. > > > > We can implement it as a configurable attribute in xml. > > For example : > > <serial type='pty'> > > <log file='$PATH/$GUESTNAME-serial0.log' append='on' timestamp="on/off"/> > > <target type='isa-serial' port='0'> > > <model name='isa-serial'/> > > </target> > > </serial> > > > > We can add a timestamp after every '\n' character received from qemu. > > Can I have some comments regarding this change like what I should keep > > in mind while implementing, whether it is a welcome addition or not, > > issues I might face, any qemu changes required. > > > > Yeah, this might be useful. We definitely need additional attribute to > control this behavior, otherwise we might break some scenarios (e.g. > where users transfer binary data via this channel. > > What I worry though, is that with stdio_handler="file", i.e. when the > file is passed to QEMU directly, then this knob won't work. So we would > need some changes to QEMU. But then, taking this idea further, if QEMU > is changed, then does it make sense to have the same code in libvirt > (for stdio_handler='logd' case)?
We could declare handler=file to be unsupported for timestamps instead of changing QEMU. I'm not too fussed whether it lives in libvirt or QEMU though With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
