On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 06:19:31PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> This results in all sockets for a service being enabled when a
> single one of them is.
> 
> The -tcp and -tls sockets are intentionally excluded, because
> enabling them should require explicit action on the
> administrator's part; moreover, disabling them should not result
> in the local sockets being disabled too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abolo...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  src/locking/virtlockd-admin.socket.in | 1 +
>  src/locking/virtlockd.socket.in       | 1 +
>  src/logging/virtlogd-admin.socket.in  | 1 +
>  src/logging/virtlogd.socket.in        | 1 +
>  src/remote/libvirtd-admin.socket.in   | 2 ++
>  src/remote/libvirtd-ro.socket.in      | 2 ++
>  src/remote/libvirtd.socket.in         | 2 ++
>  src/virtd-admin.socket.in             | 2 ++
>  src/virtd-ro.socket.in                | 2 ++
>  src/virtd.socket.in                   | 2 ++
>  10 files changed, 16 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>


With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

Reply via email to