On Mon, 17 May 2010, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 07:28:05AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
This is a repost of this previously posted patch. I'd like someone to
ACK it or let me know how to proceed with it. Thanks. Stefan
Aren't we blocked on the fact that the standards process hasn't
yet finalized the specs enough ? We don't want to fix the XML
format if there's chance that the standards will change again.
The 802.1Qbg WG has voted on the specification and taken it forward for
drafting. The version 0 specification (see link below) was specifically
written by the 802.1Qbg WG authors to enable implementation in parallel with
the formal process without being held up by it. The expectation is that
the parameters will not change.
http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2010/bg-joint-evb-0410v1.pdf
I expect the companies listed on page 2 of the version 0 specification
are implementing the spec in their products.
Vivek
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
