On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 14:05 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/17/2010 12:09 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>
> > +{
> > + virBitmap bit = bitmap[VIR_BITMAP_UNIT_OFFSET(b)] &
> > + (1 << VIR_BITMAP_BIT_OFFSET(b));
>
> Should these interfaces add sanity checks that b is in range (that is,
> smaller than the original allocated size)? Do we want to support
> dynamically-growing bitsets?
Right, should hold the number of elements it has. I think range checking
would be a good idea.
Stefan
--
libvir-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
