how many drivers aren't hypervisors ?
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/22/2010 03:48 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> > On 06/23/2010 04:16 AM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
> >> case VIR_ERR_NO_SUPPORT:
> >>>> > if (info == NULL)
> >
> > Would it be practical to expand this with category messages like?
> >
> > case VIR_ERR_NO_SUPPORT_STORAGE:
> > if (info == NULL)
> > errmsg = _("this function is not supported by the storage
> > driver");
> > ...
> >
> > case VIR_ERR_NO_SUPPORT_NETWORK:
> > if (info == NULL)
> > errmsg = _("this function is not supported by the network
> > driver");
> > ...
> >
> > Or maybe figure out a "%s" replaceable keyword for
> > network/storage/hypervisor/etc above?
>
> The whole error reporting scheme needs some loving care, and I've got a
> partial patch series posted to the list earlier that started that
> process. But it was deemed less important than getting 0.8.2 finalized
> (as well as helping with RHEL-6 backports), so it's been on the back
> burner. At this point, a minimally-invasive patch, like Daniel's
> proposal, is better than making things better when the code is all going
> to be refactored down the road anyways. But thanks for the thought; it
> may affect my refactoring efforts!
>
> --
> Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
>
>
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
>
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
