On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:44:33AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > Suggestion: > > "virsh pool-destroy" sounds highly destructive. There is a > "pool-start" command, so how about "pool-stop"? Similar > commands could be introduced for the other *-start commands.
For pools especially destroy has a bad sound to it. > This would make using virsh _much_ easier. > > In Unix world "start" and "stop" belong together, "start" > and "destroy" don't. Generally, I agree, start implies stop, but there is also the case of start-shutdown-destroy. I believe the reason for the command names is that one does a 'start' on a VM, but then either does a graceful 'shutdown' or a un-graceful 'destroy'. There is no single 'stop' in that case. None of that takes away from your original point, however, that pool-destroy is not the destructive operation that it sounds like, and I have also done virsh foo-stop many times without thinking about it. I wouldn't object to aliasing pool-stop to pool-destroy, but I'm curious to know what others on the list think. Dave > > Regards > > Harri > > -- > libvir-list mailing list > libvir-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
