If you don't mind, I have a few other questions related to this that I'd like 
to ask before I forget about them.

1) Is there any technical reason for not shipping the 32-bit version of the 
libvirt shared library for 64-bit systems??

2) Is it possible via libvirt to get that some additional information about the 
guests, such as:
        a) uptime
        b) hostname
        c) real operating system

Thanks again.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 8:12 AM
To: Tavares, John
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com; Tomen Tse; Betley, Greg; Chen, Jianjiun
Subject: Re: [libvirt] inability to open local read-only connection

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:03:05AM -0500, Tavares, John wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> Thank you for looking into this for me and providing such a detailed 
> explanation, I really appreciate it.
> 
> As a related question, will this work for RHEL6 for KVM as well along with 
> the virsh CLI??

Yes, just change the URI  to  'qemu:///system'. No need for the +unix
bit here because QEMU always goes via libvirtd.

You have KVM in RHEL5.4 or later too that this should work with...

Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London    -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org        -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|


--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to