On 09/15/2010 10:45 AM, Osier wrote:
<snip>
I guess it's a typo, should be "addr->inet6.sin6_addr.s6_addr[i]", but not
"addr->inet6.sin6_addr.s6_addr16[i]".. :-)

Thanks Osier. Pretty sure it's not a typo, *but* it lets the code compile that part of things and keep on going, so I can look for other breakage. (hopefully not caused by this "probably dodgy" workaround)

:)

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to