On 10/20/2010 07:17 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
<snip>
This may need editing as we clean up the bindings to have shorter names
(in the style of the python or Java bindings where virConn and virDomain
are object names, and can thus be omitted from function names that
operate on those objects), as well as fixing the case of libvirt. But
those patches should not be applied until the bindings are patched, so
not an issue for now.

No worries.  The present C# link on the binding page points to a 404
location, so "anything that works now" is probably better. :)

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to