On 11/12/2010 09:22 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > The XML docs describe a 'port' attribute for the > storage source <host> element, but the parser never > handled it. > > * docs/schemas/storagepool.rng: Define port attribute > * src/conf/storage_conf.c: Add missing parsing/formatting > of host port number > * src/conf/storage_conf.h: Remove bogus/unused 'protocol' field > --- > docs/schemas/storagepool.rng | 5 +++++
Missing corresponding docs/formatstorage.html.in change.
> src/conf/storage_conf.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> src/conf/storage_conf.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/schemas/storagepool.rng b/docs/schemas/storagepool.rng
> index 54eb802..8f067f3 100644
> --- a/docs/schemas/storagepool.rng
> +++ b/docs/schemas/storagepool.rng
> @@ -186,6 +186,11 @@
> <attribute name='name'>
> <text/>
> </attribute>
> + <optional>
> + <attribute name='port'>
> + <text/>
Is text really appropriate, when...
> @@ -423,6 +424,17 @@ virStoragePoolDefParseSource(xmlXPathContextPtr ctxt,
> }
>
> source->host.name = virXPathString("string(./host/@name)", ctxt);
> + port = virXPathString("string(./host/@port)", ctxt);
> + if (port) {
> + if (virStrToLong_i(port, NULL, 10, &source->host.port) < 0) {
it looks like you insist on an integer instead? For that matter, should
you do a range check that the port is < 0x10000?
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
