On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 10:49:00AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 10:49:25AM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 12:28:17PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > <...snip...>
> > > > +
> > > > + if (virThreadCreate(&pool->workers[pool->nWorkers - 1],
> > > > + true,
> > > > + virThreadPoolWorker,
> > > > + pool) < 0) {
> > > > + pool->nWorkers--;
> > > > + goto error;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > Small typo, that check should "!= NULL", rather than "< 0".
> >
> > Confused. Do you mean virThreadCreate() or VIR_ALLOC() below? But both
> > return int.
>
> virThreadCreate returns a virThreadPtr object, so you need to
> check for its pointer being non-NULL.
No, virThreadCreate doesn't allocate memory for a virThread object but
takes as its first parameter a virThreadPtr pointing to a virThread
object which is allocated by the caller.
I'd appreciate it if you can help review v5 of this series(link is
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-December/msg00181.html)
--
Thanks,
Hu Tao
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
