2010/12/23 Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>: > Rather than tying the element name to our current choice of program, can > we come up with something more generic? > > <network> > <name>xxxnet</name> > <ipv4routing>/usr/local/bin/my-dnsmasq</ipv4routing> > <ipv6routing>/usr/local/bin/my-radvd</ipv6routing> > </network> > > But the idea of allowing the XML to specify an override for the program > to run seems like it might be worthwhile.
I don't think <ipv[46]routing> are the best names, because it goes rather about tuning settings for DNS/DHCP (or NDP for ipv6) or starting additional services per started network and not setting routing. Temporary ignoring the naming I prepared following patch: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-December/msg01052.html What do you think? -- Pawel -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
