On 07/01/2011, at 6:12 PM, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote: <snip> >> Guaranteed sounds best to me. >> > Thats not Gauranteed to the best of my knowlegde > > Balbir suggest "enforced", I guessed i dropped it somewhere. > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-August/msg00712.html
Balbir's suggested wording (from the email): "limit to enforce on memory contention" Does that mean it's the minimum memory "limit" it would really like to have, but can't guarantee it? (ie it's not guaranteed) -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
