If the selinux driver is the default, it will lead to a null dereference.
This change should still yeild the intended result, since a null model
basically implies 'use the default'.

Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobi...@redhat.com>
---
 src/security/security_driver.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/security/security_driver.c b/src/security/security_driver.c
index 5711aee..7d2e0de 100644
--- a/src/security/security_driver.c
+++ b/src/security/security_driver.c
@@ -82,7 +82,8 @@ virSecurityIsSpecifiedDriver(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr,
 {
     bool ret = true;
 
-    if (!STREQ(virSecurityManagerGetModel(mgr), def->seclabel.model)) {
+    if (def->seclabel.model &&
+        !STREQ(virSecurityManagerGetModel(mgr), def->seclabel.model)) {
         virSecurityReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
                                _("security label driver mismatch: "
                                  "'%s' model configured for domain, but "
-- 
1.7.3.2

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to