On 28/01/2011, at 3:29 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 01/27/2011 09:20 AM, Justin Clift wrote: >> On 28/01/2011, at 3:19 AM, Eric Blake wrote: >>> Do we need three examples, or would two be sufficient? >>> >>> For example, vSphere/ESX has a 4MB granularity, so 263168 (257MB) would >>> be rejected while 266240 (260MB) is valid. >> >> Yeah, that'd work too. I'll just that example then push it. > > In case it wasn't clear: > > ACK with nits addressed, no need to see a v2; let's go ahead and get > this pushed with the minor fix incorporated :)
Thanks Eric, pushed. :) -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
