Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote on 02/03/2011 01:28:36 PM:

> 
> On 02/03/2011 11:12 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > It wouldn't hurt to add some parenthesis in the following two 
> similar expression for better readability.
> 
> I take it you were using some gcc option about precedence of operations
> being confusing between ! and <; including that gcc warning message in
> your commit message can aid the discussion.
> 
> > 
> > ---
> >  src/util/macvtap.c |    8 ++++----
> >  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/util/macvtap.c b/src/util/macvtap.c
> > index 09d7b78..92147ab 100644
> > --- a/src/util/macvtap.c
> > +++ b/src/util/macvtap.c
> > @@ -1048,8 +1048,8 @@ doPortProfileOpSetLink(bool nltarget_kernel,
> > 
> >              memcpy(ifla_vf_mac.mac, macaddr, 6);
> > 
> > -            if (!nla_put(nl_msg, IFLA_VF_MAC, sizeof(ifla_vf_mac),
> > -                &ifla_vf_mac) < 0)
> > +            if ((!nla_put(nl_msg, IFLA_VF_MAC, sizeof(ifla_vf_mac), 
> > +                &ifla_vf_mac)) < 0)
> 
> The indentation is wrong, too; the &ifla... of the second line should
> line up just after nla_put( of the first line.  That was botched in
> December by commit 013c000 when the lines were reindented.
> 
> Actually, you've uncovered a bigger bug, but didn't fix it right.

ohoh, yes, there's a bug. This is how it should look like

---
 src/util/macvtap.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: libvirt-acl/src/util/macvtap.c
===================================================================
--- libvirt-acl.orig/src/util/macvtap.c
+++ libvirt-acl/src/util/macvtap.c
@@ -1048,8 +1048,8 @@ doPortProfileOpSetLink(bool nltarget_ker
 
             memcpy(ifla_vf_mac.mac, macaddr, 6);
 
-            if (!nla_put(nl_msg, IFLA_VF_MAC, sizeof(ifla_vf_mac),
-                &ifla_vf_mac) < 0)
+            if (nla_put(nl_msg, IFLA_VF_MAC, sizeof(ifla_vf_mac),
+                        &ifla_vf_mac) < 0)
                 goto buffer_too_small;
         }
 
@@ -1060,8 +1060,8 @@ doPortProfileOpSetLink(bool nltarget_ker
                 .qos = 0,
             };
 
-            if (!nla_put(nl_msg, IFLA_VF_VLAN, sizeof(ifla_vf_vlan),
-                &ifla_vf_vlan) < 0)
+            if (nla_put(nl_msg, IFLA_VF_VLAN, sizeof(ifla_vf_vlan),
+                        &ifla_vf_vlan) < 0)
                 goto buffer_too_small;
         }

Regards,
Stefan
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to