On 03/02/2011 06:30 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
In virFileOperation, the parent does a fallback to a non-fork
attempt if it detects that the child returned EACCES.  However,
the child was calling _exit(-EACCESS), which does _not_ appear
as EACCES in the parent.

* src/util/util.c (virFileOperation): Correctly pass EACCES from
child to parent.
---
  src/util/util.c |    9 +++++++++
  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/util/util.c b/src/util/util.c
index bac71c8..0fe1c41 100644
--- a/src/util/util.c
+++ b/src/util/util.c
@@ -1559,6 +1559,15 @@ parenterror:
          goto childerror;
      }
  childerror:
+    /* Hook sets ret to -errno on failure, but exit must be positive.
+     * If we exit with EACCES, then parent tries again.  */
+    /* XXX This makes assumptions about errno being<  255, which is
+     * not true on Hurd.  */
+    ret = -ret;

Maybe just a matter of taste, but I think I would prefer if everywhere in virFileOperation set ret = errno (instead of -errno), and when hook is called, do "ret = - hook(...)". Then you don't need the extra "ret = -ret".

ACK either way, though.

+    if ((ret&  0xff) != ret) {
+        VIR_WARN("unable to pass desired return value %d", ret);
+        ret = 0xff;
+    }
      _exit(ret);

  }

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to