On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 14:46:12 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 14:47:36 +0800 > Osier Yang <jy...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Yes, I think it's better. Should I prepare patches ? or you'll do ? > > > > Let's see other guys's opinions before doing it, :) > > > > A patch (full change version) is here. maybe good input for discussion. > > == > >From 0bceb6f204f7551c701d9f60fecd82562b38bd50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com> > Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 14:46:08 +0900 > Subject: [PATCH] Rename swap_hard_limit as memswap_hard_limit > > This patch affects qemu and lxc, using memory cgroup. > > Linux's memory cgroup's memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes is a limit > for memory+swap, not for swap. > (This behavior is for avoiding bad influence for global vmscan > and never disturb kswapd behavior by user's setting.) > Argh, thats me... :( Thanks for the patch Kame.
Reviewed-by: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nik...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Regards, Nikunj -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
