On 03/10/2011 12:05 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:58:25PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:31:07AM +0100, Michal Novotny wrote:
On 03/10/2011 07:12 AM, Lyre wrote:
The spec was copied from Radek's original php-libvirt with the
License untouched, I'm not sure about it.
Ok Lyre, then I guess Radek wanted to stick with the PHP licence.
However by naming it php-libvirt he was violating the licence
because of following paragraph:
Can we check with Radek if it's okay to switch to LGPLv2 ?
I assume you actually mean LGPLv2+ (ie the or-later variety)
Well, I agree that LGPLv2+ license would be better. We need to wait for
Lyre's and Radek's reply then.
Michal
--
Michal Novotny<minov...@redhat.com>, RHCE
Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
