于 2011年03月30日 23:56, Jean-Baptiste Rouault 写道:
On Wednesday 30 March 2011 17:23:51 Osier Yang wrote:
Yes, actually I also prefer to add new flag to API, but not in
virsh instead, however, adding new flag argument is not workable,
how about introduce a new API, something like "virDomainUndefineFlag"?
I wanted to suggest something similar because I'm annoyed that
calling undefine on an OpenVZ domain destroys the container private area...
Hi, Jean
Could you explain more? Wanna known if can do it incidentally, though
I'm guessing it's caused by openvz driver destroying the private
area internally, something like "vzctl --destroy". If it's right
for your meaning, then IMHO we can't introduce new flag for this,
as it's only openvz driver specificly.
Regards
Osier
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
