On 05/13/2011 02:56 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:34:24AM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote: >>> Then, screen is calculated as >>> >>> Screen Device Head >>> 0 video0 0 >>> 1 video0 1 >>> 2 video1 0 >>> 3 video1 1 >>> 4 video1 2 >>> 5 video1 3 >>> >>> >>> >>> Incidentally an RFE is needed against QEMU, since it can only do screen >>> dump of the first device :-( >>> >>> Daniel >> >> Yes, that is what I had in my mind when creating this concept. > > Ok, please document that in the API docs for the public API > >> Or would it be better to split screen ID into video # and head #? > > No, I think that's probably overkill, unless anyone can think of > something we can do with them separated, that we can't do with them > combined...
Good thing we have the flags argument. When you have a card that supports multiple monitors, I could see it being worth capturing a screenshot of just one monitor, vs. a combined screenshot of both monitors as a single image. With the above layout, this could be done as: virDomainScreenshot(dom, st, 1, 0) - just screen 1 (head 1 of video0) virDomainScreenshot(dom, st, 1, VIR_DOMAIN_SCREENSHOT_DEVICE) - composite of all screens on video1 (that is, screens 2-5) of course, supposing that the hypervisors support combined imaging. -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
