On 07/29/2011 03:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
Currently, we attempt to run sync job and async job at the same time. It
means that the monitor commands for two jobs can be run in any order.



v3: incorporate Wen's feedback - in particular, virProcessStartCPUs
now checks for return type, restarting libvirt does not use an
async job, and I didn't hit the deadlock in the same scenarios as
I tested under v2.
I still need to do migration testing before I'm convinced that this
is right, but it's doing a lot better.

Nope, just got a deadlock, by sending SIGINT (^C) during the middle of virsh managedsave. I'll have to keep looking for that culprit...

--
Eric Blake   ebl...@redhat.com    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to