On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:54:36AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 10:15:37PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 09:53:39AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728772 > > > points out that libvirt commit 1c93fbbb pulled in a gnulib > > > regression that broke large file support. > > > > I had a quick look and rerunning this pulls in quite some auto* changes. > > Any pointers how a minimal patch against 0.9.4 should look like that > > distributors could apply? > > Yes, there is a patch attached to that BZ ticket above that is > the minimal workaround distros should apply. Works great. Thanks, -- Guido
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
