On 08/11/2011 09:12 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 08:39:23PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
We forgot to add virDomainUndefineFlags for a couple of hypervisors.
This wires up trivial versions (since neither hypervisor supports
managed save yet, they do not need to support any flags).
* src/vbox/vbox_tmpl.c (vboxDomainCreateXML): Update caller.
(vboxDomainUndefine): Move guts...
(vboxDomainUndefineFlags): ...to new function.
* src/xenapi/xenapi_driver.c (xenapiDomainUndefine)
(xenapiDomainUndefineFlags): Likewise.
---
I'm still debating on whether implementations that lack managed
save should trivially support 'undefine --managed-save' (there's
none to undefine), instead of the current behavior of rejecting
it as an unknown flag. But that's an independent question.
What I'll probably do is teach virsh to treat --managed-save as a no-op
if a domain does not support managed save rather than forcing the flag
down to the client to be rejected; touching just virsh is nicer than
touching every single hypervisor to add an ignored flag bit, and I
already have to touch virsh undefine to implement new --snapshot flags.
ACK,
Pushed.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
